Axes and foreshortening

9 min

Why one image is enough – three axes, three ratios and Pohlke’s theorem.

Not Started
In space – the image plane
ρxyzXYZn
The axonometric drawing
x0.817y0.817z0.817O

System

Orthogonal

Oblique

Ratios and angles

p (x)
0.8165
q (y)
0.8165
r (z)
0.8165
∠(x, y)
120°
∠(y, z)
120°
∠(z, x)
120°
p² + q² + r² = 2
Every orthogonal axonometry gives exactly 2 – that is its fundamental theorem. Try moving the view direction: the ratios change, the sum does not.

Show

Spatial view

2

Theory

Axonometry shows a body with a single image instead of two. The three coordinate axes project to three axes on the drawing, and the point [x, y, z] is laid off as x·(image of x) + y·(image of y) + z·(image of z). Each axis carries its own foreshortening ratio p, q, r.

A ratio says how much of its true length a unit on that axis keeps in the drawing. That is why the axonometric image of a cube is never a cube: edges in different directions are shortened differently, and that difference is the entire spatial information a single image carries.

Pohlke’s theorem says something surprising: any three segments from one point (as long as they are not collinear) can be taken as the parallel projection of three equal, mutually perpendicular segments. So you may choose the axes almost freely and the image is still a valid projection of a cube – which is precisely why oblique axonometry exists alongside orthogonal.

3

Step-by-step construction

3D – what happens in space
Oxyz
1 / 6
4

Practice

Build the construction yourself

3D – what you have
Oxyz

What is the next step?

1 / 5

Choose the step that comes next. The drawing only advances on a correct choice.

Check your understanding

1

What does the ratio p on the x-axis tell you?

2

Why does the axonometric image of a cube never look like a cube?

3

What does Pohlke’s theorem state?

5

Downloadable material

A PDF for this lesson is in preparation.

Need help?

Book a lesson and we will go through it together, step by step.

Book a lesson